Whilst many clinical negligence claims are defended, very few go all the way to trial for a Judge to determine the outcome. This is because a claim has to go through many stages before trial, all of which are aimed at narrowing the issues between the parties and encouraging settlement.
In February, one of our cases went to trial at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. The case concerned a delay in diagnosis of lung cancer. K had attended hospital in May 2016 with shortness of breath. A chest x-ray was performed which showed a lesion in the lung and advised further investigation. Unfortunately this report was not acted upon and K was sent home.
In November 2016, he returned to hospital, again due to shortness of breath, and a further chest x-ray was performed which showed the lesion had increased significantly in size since the x-ray in May. Further investigations were undertaken and K was diagnosed with lung cancer. Unfortunately, he died in February 2017 shortly after his first cycle of chemotherapy.
The hospital admitted straight away they should have acted upon the x-ray report of May 2016 and this would have resulted in K’s cancer being diagnosed 6 months earlier. The dispute arose out of the difference earlier diagnosis would have made; our expert oncologist was of the view K would have survived 8 years with earlier diagnosis, the Defendant was of the view he would have survived an additional 2 years. This made a significant difference to the amount of compensation due, much of which comprised damages for financial dependency for K’s widow, T.
Despite every effort to settle the claim before trial, this was not possible and a 3 day trial in the High Court took place in February. Our expert was compelling on the stand and the Judge found his evidence more persuasive than the Defendant’s expert which meant T was successful in proving her claim as alleged. Although it would have been far better for T to have the claim settled earlier and to have avoided the ordeal of attending trial, as the Judge awarded T more compensation than she had offered to settle the claim ahead of trial, she was also awarded a 10% increase in her compensation to penalise the Defendant for not accepting her earlier offer. A 6 figure settlement will not ease T’s pain of losing her husband but it will now give her financial security for the future.
Anything can happen at trial as it really is the unknown. We are reliant on one Judge agreeing with our view of the case over the Defendant’s. However, as these cases rely so heavily on the experts and their evidence, we make sure we instruct the best experts with the best reputations and scrutinise their evidence throughout the claim. Whilst there is no guarantee we will win should a case go to trial, and in the vast majority of cases they settle beforehand, we do all we can to ensure we stand the best chance possible of succeeding with the claim.
If you or a family member would like to speak to a solicitor for some free, no obligation advice, please contact us on 01642 231110.
Kathryn Watson – April 2020